Draft RTS on CDD published

In March 2025, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published its draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) under Article 28(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering Regulation (AMLR). This development is a cornerstone of the EU’s shift toward a harmonised, single-rulebook framework for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT), led by the newly established Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA).

These draft RTS aim to unify and clarify Customer Due Diligence (CDD) obligations across the EU. For financial institutions and other obliged entities, this marks a significant evolution in AML/CFT compliance—moving away from fragmented national interpretations toward a more centralised, risk-based approach.

Key Objectives of the Draft RTS on CDD

The RTS under Article 28(1) AMLR seek to:

  1. Standardise CDD practices across Member States

  2. Clarify the information to be collected under Standard, Simplified, and Enhanced Due Diligence regimes

  3. Define acceptable sources for verifying identity

  4. Guide supervisors on risk factors for electronic money exemptions

  5. Set out attributes for electronic identification means and trust services

The overarching intent is to reduce compliance uncertainty, regulatory arbitrage, and operational inefficiencies—particularly for cross-border providers.

Principles-Based and Risk-Based: A Balanced Approach

Responding to private sector feedback, the EBA has steered clear of a one-size-fits-all, overly prescriptive rulebook. Instead, the RTS adopt a principles-based, risk-sensitive approach. This allows obliged entities flexibility in how they collect and verify customer information, provided outcomes meet regulatory expectations.

For instance, the RTS refrain from mandating specific documents for CDD but instead require that the sources be “reliable and independent,” allowing entities to align verification methods with the customer profile, risk level, and delivery channel.

Implications for Electronic Identification and eIDAS

A critical point of discussion has been the interpretation of Article 22(6) of the AMLR, which references eIDAS-compliant identity tools. The draft RTS clarify that while eIDAS-based verification should be used where available and reasonable, it should not be the sole pathway. This is particularly important for:

  • Non-EU residents

  • Vulnerable populations

  • Firms operating in jurisdictions where eIDAS is not commonly adopted

Obliged entities may continue to use robust, alternative digital onboarding solutions, such as those aligned with the EBA’s 2022 Remote Customer Onboarding Guidelines.

Staged Implementation for Existing Customers

Another practical measure proposed by the EBA is a transitional approach to updating CDD records for existing clients. While the AMLR suggests a compliance date of 10 July 2027, the RTS recommend a risk-based prioritisation strategy:

  • High-risk relationships should be updated by 2027

  • Other relationships may be updated over a five-year transition period

This phased strategy is critical for managing operational burden while maintaining AML/CFT effectiveness.

What This Means for Financial Institutions

With the publication of these draft RTS, firms must begin preparing for a significantly more standardised and supervised CDD regime. Key actions include:

  • Gap assessments against the draft RTS and AMLR provisions

  • Reviewing and enhancing digital onboarding processes

  • Aligning internal policies with the risk-based approach to data collection and verification

  • Planning for the transition period, including resource allocation and client communication strategies

How I Can Help

As a regulatory consultant specialising in AML/CFT and fintech regulation, I assist firms in understanding and implementing complex compliance frameworks like the AMLR and its technical standards. I offer:

  • Detailed CDD framework reviews

  • Policy and procedure design aligned with the AMLR and RTS

  • Support for remote onboarding assessments

  • Strategic advice on risk-based implementation timelines

Previous
Previous

Stress Testing Deposit Guarantee Schemes

Next
Next

DORA in force